A Significant Reduction In The Number Of Heart Attacks And Reduce Mortality In Northern California – Part 3 of 3
For that, he credits state-of-the-art prevention strategies. The health plan maintains electronic medical records of all enrollees, which are nearby at all times to all physicians in the program. “The technology is used at every point of contact. If you go to an ophthalmologist to have your eyes checked, he can see that you haven’t had your blood lipids checked, and can have that done on the spot.
If you go to an pinch room with chest pains, it can call up an older EKG electrocardiogram to see how it compares with the current one. If you have heart failure, we can check to see if there are any major changes in weight, and so on”. The Kaiser Permanente results presumably are achievable elsewhere in the United States, based on population characteristics. “Our population is very representative of racial diversity natural medicine. It is arguably more distinct than what you see in the rest of the country”.
Parts: 1 2 3
A Significant Reduction In The Number Of Heart Attacks And Reduce Mortality In Northern California – Part 2 of 3
A number of registries have looked at focus disease outcomes for decades, “and we have seen since the 1990s a consistent and persistent fall in deaths from heart disease. We see the same pattern in just about every group,” and the Kaiser Permanente report presents “highly able-bodied data” about the reduction in heart attacks and the deaths they cause.
What’s most impressive is that the study links increased use of heart medications such as beta blockers, ACE inhibitors and cholesterol-lowering statins to the trends. “Preventive strategies really work”.
Between 2000 and 2008, the incidence of heart attacks in the Kaiser Permanente plan dropped from 287 cases per 100000 person-years to 208 cases per 100000 person-years, the turn up said. The incidence of STEMI heart attacks decreased from 133 to 50 per 100000 person-years over the same period. And the 30-day demise rate, adjusted for age and sex, dropped from 10,5 percent in 1999 to 7,8 percent in 2008.
Go attributes the lowered heart attack toll to better preventive measures aimed at known endanger factors. While the Kaiser Permanente group shows the same negative trends of decreased physical activity and increased obesity as the United States at large, “we did find in the later years improved pilot of certain risk factors, such as high blood pressure and cholesterol. There has also been a decline in smoking”. Although he acknowledged better in-hospital treatment of heart attacks, he said “we basically regard the big driver of what we found is the reduction of the most severe STEMI heart attacks”.
Parts: 1 2 3
A Significant Reduction In The Number Of Heart Attacks And Reduce Mortality In Northern California – Part 1 of 3
A Significant Reduction In The Number Of Heart Attacks And Reduce Mortality In Northern California. In the strife against heart disease, here’s some ample news from the front lines: A large study reports a 24 percent decline in heart attacks and a significant reduction in deaths since 1999 in one northern California population. The most arousing finding in the study of more than 46000 hospitalizations between 1999 and 2008 is a striking reduction in the most serious form of heart attacks, known as STEMI, said Dr Alan S Go, a chairperson of the study reported in the June 10 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. “The relative incidence of STEMI went down by 62 percent in the past decade,” said Go, overseer of the Comprehensive Clinical Research Unit at Kaiser Permanente, one of the nation’s largest not-for-profit health-care providers.
STEMI (segment elevation myocardial infarction) is an acronym derived from the electrocardiogram sequence of the most severe heart attacks, the ones mostly likely to cause permanent disability or death. Myocardial infarction is the formal medical term for a heart attack.
Because of the decrease in heart attack deaths, sentiment disease is no longer the leading cause of death among the northern California residents enrolled in the Permanente Medical Group, said Dr Robert Pearl, executive director of the group. Nationwide, resolution disease has been the leading cause of American deaths for decades. In the group, it is now second to cancer.
The report offers an example of what a highly organized, technologically advanced health-care drawing can accomplish. “If every American got the same level of care, we would avoid 200000 heart attacks and stroke deaths in this country every year. The numbers in the report are definitely credible and are consistent with the trends we are whereas elsewhere,” said Dr Michael Lauer, director of the division of cardiovascular sciences at the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Parts: 1 2 3
The Use Of Colonoscopy Reduces The Risk Of Colon Cancer – Part 3 of 3
Then there’s the issue of who’s doing the test, which might be key. “Colonoscopy performed by an experienced gastroenterologist or endoscopist probably mitigates the miss assess on the right side. Myself and a lot of colleagues spend a lot of time in the right colon going back and forth, back and forth. You cannot just whip the scope out from there. You’ve got to spend time”.
Weinberg added that the multitude of colonoscopies a person has performed also might make a difference. “This is a very good screening mechanism against a very common cancer. It’s not perfect, but it works a lot better than nothing”. Kaul agreed. “This paper adds a illiberal more bite to the argument that, yes, colonoscopy is an invasive procedure.
Yes, it is somewhat costly compared to some of the other available options. But, it probably is the best value for the money out there”. A second-best study in the same issue of the journal found that only advanced colorectal cancers with the normal version of the KRAS gene will benefit from targeted drugs known as anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibodies, such as cetuximab (Erbitux) and panitumumab (Vectibix) desperate horny mummies for sex on whatsapp exchange contact numbers. A cavalcade of previously conducted trials determined that people with advanced tumors with the mutated version of the gene did not live as long as those with the “wild-type” adaptation of the gene.
Parts: 1 2 3
The Use Of Colonoscopy Reduces The Risk Of Colon Cancer – Part 2 of 3
The American Cancer Society recommends that normal-risk men and women be screened for colon cancer, starting at lifetime 50. A colonoscopy once every 10 years is one of the recommended screening tools. However, there has been some debate as to whether colonoscopy – an invasive and expensive procedure – is certainly preferable to other screening methods, such as flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Based on a review of medical records of 1688 German patients aged 50 and over with colorectal cancer and 1,932 without, the researchers found a 77 percent reduced endanger for this type of malignancy among people who’d had a colonoscopy in the past 10 years, as compared with those who had not. The lion’s share of the benefit was seen for left-sided cancers, although there was still a 50 percent reduction on the above-board side (only 26 percent among those aged 60 and younger).
No one knows why colonoscopy seems to be superior in detecting problems on the left affectation of the colon. “There are a number of potential reasons. It may be that the biology is conspiring to make it harder. The polyps look different, grow differently. Also, the quality of the laxative studying tends to be less effective than on the other side so you might be more likely to miss something”.
Parts: 1 2 3
The Use Of Colonoscopy Reduces The Risk Of Colon Cancer – Part 1 of 3
The Use Of Colonoscopy Reduces The Risk Of Colon Cancer. In totting up to reducing the risk of cancer on the left side of the colon, inexperienced research indicates that colonoscopies may also reduce cancer risk on the right side. The finding contradicts some previous research that had indicated a right-side “blind spots” when conducting colonoscopies. However, the right-side promote shown in the new study, published in the Jan 4, 2011 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine, was slightly less effective than that seen on the left side.
And “We didn’t really have sapid data proving that anything is very good at preventing right-sided cancer,” said Dr Vivek Kaul, acting chief of gastroenterology and hepatology at the University of Rochester Medical Center. “Here is a composition that suggests that risk reduction is pretty robust even in the right side. The risk reduction is not as exciting as in the left side, but it’s still more than 50 percent. That’s a little keen to ignore”.
The news is “reassuring,” agreed Dr David Weinberg, chairman of medicine at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, who wrote an accompanying editorial on the finding. Though no one weigh ever provides definitive proof “if the data from this study is in fact true, then this gives strong support for current guidelines”.
Parts: 1 2 3
Lifestyle Affects Breast Cancer Risk – Part 3 of 3
The study appears online June 24 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, where the maker of an accompanying editorial applauded the research. The findings provide “extremely important information relevant to counseling women on how much danger reduction they can expect by changing behaviors, and also highlights the basic public health concept that small changes in individual risk can translate into a meaningful reduction in disease in a large population,” Dr Kathy J Helzlsouer, of Mercy Medical Center in Baltimore, wrote in a fortnightly news release badhane.
Parts: 1 2 3