Dirty Water Destroys People. Part 3 of 3

We also measured groundwater at two sites that had very little natural gas drilling and had no drilling”. The flood samples from sites with known spills contained moderate to high levels of hormone-disrupting chemicals compared to samples taken from sites located away from fracking, the researchers found. They also found run levels of the chemicals in samples taken from the Colorado River.

So “If you count up all the types of activity, our sites had on average double the activity relative to our control sites. Nagel said she hopes this check out raises a red flag for people who live near fracking operations. “We found more endocrine-disrupting activity in the water close to drilling locations that had experienced spills than at comparison sites,” she said in the flash release. “This could raise the risk of reproductive, metabolic, neurological and other diseases, especially in children who are exposed to endocrine-disrupting chemicals” neosizeplus men. Although the study found a potential risk of hormonal disruption from living near fracking operations, it did not be shown a cause-and-effect relationship.

Parts: 1 2 3

Dirty Water Destroys People. Part 2 of 3

He said the researchers grossly overestimated the enumerate of chemicals used in the process. “Activists promote a lot of bad science and shoddy research, but this study – if you can even command it that – may be the worst yet. From falsely characterizing the US regulatory environment to flat out making stuff up about the additives used in hydraulic fracturing, it’s hard to see how experiment with like this is helpful. Unless, of course, you’re trying to use the media to help you scare the public”.

In conducting the study, the researchers took a two-pronged approach. First, Nagel and her colleagues calculated 12 fracking chemicals in the laboratory to determine whether they could disrupt male or female hormone function. They purchased the chemicals from a supply company and then exposed human cell cultures to the chemicals. The researchers observed the rejoinder of receptors for male hormones (androgens) such as testosterone and the female hormone estrogen.

So “We found that 11 of those 12 (chemicals) disrupt either the estrogen or the androgen receptor,” Nagel said in an interview. The researchers then went out into the field, taking inundate samples from Garfield County, Colo, an area with more than 10000 active wells. “We went to five sites that have experienced some kidney of accident or spill related to natural gas fracking, and measured surface and groundwater.

Parts: 1 2 3

Dirty Water Destroys People. Part 1 of 3

Dirty Water Destroys People. Groundwater and face water samples taken near fracking operations in Colorado contained chemicals that can disrupt male and female hormones, researchers say. These chemicals, which are employed in the fracking process, also were present in samples taken from the Colorado River, which serves as the drainage basin for the region, according to the study, which was published online Dec 16, 2013 in the roll Endocrinology. “More than 700 chemicals are used in the fracking process, and many of them disturb hormone function,” study co-author Susan Nagel, an assistant professor at the University of Missouri School of Medicine, said in a register news release.

And “With fracking on the rise, populations may face greater health risks from increased endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure”. Exposure to these chemicals can burgeon cancer risk and hamper reproduction by decreasing female fertility and the quality and quantity of sperm, the researchers said. Hydraulic fracturing, also called fracking, is a controversial process that involves pumping water, sand and chemicals into underground at high pressure.

The purpose is to crack open hydrocarbon-rich shale and extract natural gas. Previous studies have raised concerns that such drilling techniques could persuade to contamination of drinking water. The oil and gas industries strongly disputed this new study, noting that the researchers took their samples from fracking sites where unwitting spills had occurred. Steve Everley, a spokesman for industry group Energy in Depth, also disputed claims in the research that fracking is exempt from the federal Safe Drinking Water Act and the Clean Water Act.

Parts: 1 2 3

Effects Of Some Industrial Chemicals To Increase The Risk Of Breast Cancer. Part 3 of 3

There are different kinds of risk factors. Some factors, similarly to a person’s age or race, can’t be changed. Others are linked to cancer-causing factors in the environment. Still others are related personal behaviors, such as smoking, drinking, and diet. Some factors on risk more than others, and your risk for breast cancer can change over time, due to factors such as aging or lifestyle vimaxpill men.

Parts: 1 2 3

Effects Of Some Industrial Chemicals To Increase The Risk Of Breast Cancer. Part 2 of 3

Above-normal EZH2 levels have once upon a time been linked to a higher risk for breast cancer, the research team noted. “We have demonstrated a novel mechanism by which endocrine-disrupting chemicals regulate developmental programming in the breast. This retreat generates important safety concerns about exposures to environmental endocrine disruptors such as BPA and suggests a potential need to monitor women exposed to these chemicals for the development of breast lesions as adults”.

A jeopardy factor is anything that affects your chance of getting a disease, such as cancer. Different cancers have different risk factors. For example, exposing skin to strong sunlight is a imperil factor for skin cancer. Smoking is a risk factor for cancers of the lung, mouth, larynx (voice box), bladder, kidney, and several other organs.

But risk factors don’t tell us everything. Having a chance factor, or even several, does not mean that you will get the disease. Most women who have one or more breast cancer risk factors never develop the disease, while many women with breast cancer have no apparent risk factors (other than being a chambermaid and growing older). Even when a woman with risk factors develops breast cancer, it is hard to know just how much these factors may have contributed to her cancer.

Parts: 1 2 3

Effects Of Some Industrial Chemicals To Increase The Risk Of Breast Cancer. Part 1 of 3

Effects Of Some Industrial Chemicals To Increase The Risk Of Breast Cancer. The children of women who are exposed to in the cards industrial chemicals while expecting are at an increased risk for developing breast cancer as adults, a new animal study suggests. The chemicals – bisphenol-A (BPA) and diethylstilbestrol (DES) – are first of all produced for industrial manufacturing purposes, and are known for interfering with hormonal and metabolic processes, while disturbing neurological and immune function, among both people and animals.

So “BPA is a weak estrogen and DES is a sharp estrogen, yet our study shows both have a profound effect on gene expression in the mammary gland breast throughout life,” study author Dr Hugh Taylor, from the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, said in a newsflash release from the Endocrine Society. “All estrogens, even ‘weak’ ones, can alter the development of the breast and ultimately place adult women who were exposed to them prenatally at jeopardize of breast cancer”.

The findings will be published in the June issue of Hormones & Cancer, the journal of the Endocrine Society. The authors draw their conclusions from work with club mice who were exposed to both BPA and DES. Once reaching adulthood, the offspring were found to produce higher than normal levels of a protein involved in gene regulation, called EZH2.

Parts: 1 2 3